<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Will Shaver's Blog &#187; Eugene</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.willshaver.com/blog/category/eugene/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.willshaver.com/blog</link>
	<description>Life, Dancing, Eugene Politics, Drivel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 16:49:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Save The Ugly Too?</title>
		<link>http://www.willshaver.com/blog/2009/01/29/save-the-ugly-too/</link>
		<comments>http://www.willshaver.com/blog/2009/01/29/save-the-ugly-too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 07:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Will Shaver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Eugene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willshaver.com/blog/?p=38</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	Eugene-the-collective desires infill, has almost none of it, and certainly doesn&#8217;t want it anywhere near &#8220;my house&#8221;. While most Eugeneans would agree with the general sentiments of promoting density, limiting urban grown boundary expansion, and generally becoming more European few would have any idea how to go about this. 

To this end, the City of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>	Eugene-the-collective desires infill, has almost none of it, and certainly doesn&#8217;t want it anywhere near &#8220;my house&#8221;. While most Eugeneans would agree with the general sentiments of promoting density, limiting urban grown boundary expansion, and generally becoming more European few would have any idea how to go about this. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.willshaver.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/pinkhouse.jpg"><img src="http://www.willshaver.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/pinkhouse-150x150.jpg" alt="pinkhouse" title="pinkhouse" width="150" height="150" class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-39" align="right" /></a></p>
<p>To this end, the City of Eugene formed the <a href="http://www.eugene-or.gov/portal/server.pt?open=512&#038;objID=735&#038;PageID=0&#038;cached=true&#038;mode=2&#038;userID=2">Infill Compatibility Standards Task Team</a>. The goal of the group is to &#8220;prevent negative impacts of infill and encourage positive infill.&#8221; This would seem like a worthy cause, but I would counter that the name of the group and the goal are not the same. </p>
<p>Eugene has a number of nice neighborhoods where you&#8217;ll find beautiful homes, gardens, and public space. But as with any city there will always be a house or two that don&#8217;t fit in with the surrounding area. For example consider these three shots from the Whittaker / Skinner Butte area. The first two are examples of infill, with both of these examples being attractive and &#8220;in character&#8221; with the surrounding area. The final example is an eyesore, but is most certainly not infill. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.willshaver.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/purplehouse.jpg"><img src="http://www.willshaver.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/purplehouse-150x150.jpg" alt="purplehouse" title="purplehouse" width="150" height="150" class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-40"  align="right" /></a></p>
<p>The problem with being &#8220;Compatible&#8221; is that sometimes the existing neighborhood is ugly to begin with. I live in a house that was built in the 1970s in the Churchill area. My neighborhood and several others around were constructed in cookie-cutter fashion, with about five different house patterns to choose from. All of them are single story, with a two car garage, a useless fireplace, and are set back from the street approximately the same amount. In short, I live in a mostly-ugly neighborhood. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.willshaver.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/ugly.jpg"><img src="http://www.willshaver.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/ugly-150x150.jpg" alt="ugly" title="ugly" width="150" height="150" class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-41"  align="right"/></a></p>
<p>Now perhaps you live in the house next door and are tempted to take offense at my less than high praise of your house. Let me remind you that your house is probably the same layout as mine, has the same thin walls and the same uselessly small closets that mine has. We live in our respective houses because they had the correct beauty-per-dollar ratio for our wallet size. (The same can be said of those fortunate enough to live in  nicer houses.) </p>
<p>Some neighborhoods are simply not compatible with beauty. Don&#8217;t put that nice looking multi-family building next to me! My house would look even worse than it already is, and I&#8217;d feel like even more of a schmuck for living here. Only ugly homes here please. </p>
<p>What a horrible reality that would be, as we&#8217;d never improve the existing neighborhoods that need it most. I would much rather we gradually move in the direction of beauty even if it doesn&#8217;t fit the immediate surroundings. If you&#8217;d like to buy my house and put an attractive multi-family home here I&#8217;m sure we could work something out.</p>
<p>Perhaps the &#8220;Infill compatibility standards task team&#8221; should be renamed to the &#8220;Ugly building elimination task team&#8221; and just be done with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.willshaver.com/blog/2009/01/29/save-the-ugly-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
